Custom Search
Showing posts with label Receivables. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Receivables. Show all posts

No-Fear Factor

No-Fear Factor: For professional clients who fear liability, an accounts receivable factoring plan can be a valuable asset protection tool.
Roccy DeFrancesco. Financial Planning. New York: Nov 1, 2003. pg. 1

Abstract (Summary)
Accounts receivable factoring is now being used as a planning tool to help high-end clients protect their assets and reduce their income tax. Simply put, factoring is selling an account receivable at a discount (as authorized by Section 453). Most of the time, factoring is used when a company has a large account receivable on the books that would represent a good portion of the profits for the company for the year. Factoring is a good deal for the seller because he gets money today to pay bills or pay owners and employees of the company. Factoring is also good for the purchaser, who can afford to wait to collect 100% of the account receivable bought at a discount. Discounts on accounts receivable range from 5% to 50% depending on the industry. Factoring is common in the medical field because payments from insurance carriers are often slow, due to poor billing practices or heavy paperwork in the medical office. Moreover, professionals such as doctors, lawyers, and increasingly CPAs work in areas where malpractice or errors and omissions claims are plentiful. In professional practices, accounts receivable are typically the only real asset of the company, since the value in a practice lies with the individual owners, not in the company's hard assets.

As long as businesses have been extending credit to their customers, accounts receivable have been a fact of life. And accounts receivable factoring has been around nearly as long as accounts receivable themselves, usually to improve cash flow.

Increasingly, accounts receivable factoring is now being used as a planning tool to help high-end clients protect their assets and reduce their income tax. This article will provide an overview of how one particular type of accounts receivable factoring plan can work to benefit your clientsand why financial advisers should be wary of accounts receivable leveraging plans.

What is factoring? Simply put, factoring is selling an account receivable at a discount (as authorized by IRC Section 453). Most of the time, factoring is used when a company has a large account receivable on the books that would represent a good portion of the profits for the company for the year. That particular account receivable might not get paid prior to year-end from a client who has no money. That means the company will have a cash flow problem and potentially no profit for the year unless it can figure out a way to collect the account receivable.

For a company to send a client to collections and hope to get paid on a large debt prior to year-end is unrealistic. Small- business owners know too well how long it takes to collect from clients who have no money (sometimes it take years). What is the alternative to waiting to go through the collection process? Factoring. Many firms specialize in buying other company's accounts receivable at a discount, confident that it will ultimately get all or most of the debt in a timely fashion.

Factoring is a good deal for the seller because he or she gets money today to pay bills or pay owners and employees of the company. Factoring is also good for the purchaser, who can afford to wait to collect 100% of the account receivable bought at a discount. Discounts on accounts receivable range from 5% to 50% depending on the industry.

Let's look at an example for a medical office. Assume the office has $1 million of "real" accounts receivable (not the fluff that comes from what is billed). A factoring company contracts with the medical office to buy the $1 million for $900,000 and will cut a check today for that $900,000. The factoring company runs the risk that the million dollars will not be collected by the medical office, but when and if the accounts receivable in question are collected, the factoring company will be able to make a nice profit.

Factoring is common in the medical field because payments from insurance carriers are often slow, due to poor billing practices or heavy paperwork in the medical office. Moreover, professionals such as doctors, lawyers, and increasingly CPAs work in areas where malpractice or errors and omissions (E&O) claims are plentiful. In professional practices, accounts receivable are typically the only real asset of the company, since the value in a practice lies with the individual owners, not in the company's hard assets.

If a patient of a physician has a bad outcome from surgery or a client of an attorney or CPA is harmed by flawed professional advice, the professional entity will be sued along with the individual who caused the damage. And the claims for damages in any major lawsuit are likely to be above the liability policy limits of the professional's malpractice or E&O carrier. These days, a jury verdict can come in that's far in excess of policy limits. If that happens, the accounts receivable of the professional office could be in danger.

With accounts receivable factoring, the professional office sells an ongoing stream of its accounts receivable to a factoring company. Thus, the accounts receivable are no longer an asset of the company subject to claims of creditors. So if a malpractice lawsuit returned a verdict against a physician and the practice for $1 million more than the policy limits, a judge could not require the medical practice to liquidate its accounts receivable to pay that verdict, since the office no longer owns them.

If I stopped here, you might wonder why a company without any cash flow needs would want to factor accounts receivable, since the cost in the previous example was a $100,000 factoring fee. First, it's always useful to provide asset protection for accounts receivable when possible. Second, the concept of accounts receivable factoring can act as an income tax reduction tool as well.

How? One company in the marketplace will factor your accounts receivable and through a marketing incentive contribute 88% of that factored amount into a supplemental benefit plan for key company employees or owners. The best way to illustrate how this accounts receivable factoring works to reduce taxes and fund a supplemental benefit plan is through an example.

Take Dr. Smith, age 45, who earns $1 million a year as a cardiologist in his company, Dr. Smith P.C. He hears about factoring plans and decides that he would like to protect his accounts receivable and reduce his income by $100,000 a year if he could also invest money in a tax favorable manner.

Dr. Smith P.C. contracts with a factoring company to sell $500,000 of its accounts receivable at a 5% discount four times a year. (In a medical practice, accounts receivable turn over on average every 90 days). By factoring, Dr. Smith creates a $100,000 factoring fee over the year (5% x $500,000 x 4 = $100,000). After factoring, Dr. Smith then takes home pre-tax income of $900,000 for the year.

The factoring company on a post-tax basis contributes 88% of the factored amount ($100,000 x .88 = $88,000) into an life insurance investment. The 88% represents 89% of the total premium going into the life policy. Using post-tax money, Dr. Smith will become an investor in that same life insurance policy, putting in 11% of the premium ($10,876). He then co-owns the policy with the factoring company.

By contract, Dr. Smith will have access to all the cash value in the policy via policy loans, which provide much greater tax-free income than he would have had from a taxable investment account. (See "An Accounts Receivable Primer" at right.) When Dr. Smith dies, the factoring company will receive its premiums paid plus appreciation at the long-term applicable federal rate (i.e., simple compounding) in the form of a death benefit from the life policy.

There are some potential downsides to this plan that you must consider. Accounts receivable factoring tends to work best if the client funds the plan for a certain periodtypically five, seven, or 10 years. If the client stops prematurely, the life policy will stop being funded in a tax favorable manner. As with any life policy, the client can lower the death benefit. For a brief period, however, the client and factoring company would have owned a policy with too much death benefit. The plan will not work as illustrated, but it should work much better then post-tax investing. But if there is even a remote possibility a client will want to get out in the first year or two, an accounts receivable factoring plan is not the right choice.

In addition, the client does well by being able to borrow all the cash out of the life policy. But the client also has the burden of keeping the life policy in place until death, which is a contractual obligation of the plan. If a client used a variable life policy and the stock market went in the tank (and slashed the cash value of the policy), he or she could be on the hook to pay future premiums out of pocket to keep the policy in place until death. That is why I never sell variable life with an accounts receivable factoring plan and recommend using a policy with a minimum rate of return.

There is one final caution. Remember that if the client stops the factoring plan, his or her accounts receivable will no longer be protected assets.

Even considering these caveats, an accounts receivable factoring plan can do a tremendous service for your clients who are looking for asset protection and reduced income taxes. If you are used to dealing with 419 welfare benefit plansa tough sell with the new regulationsor the popular 412(i) plan, you should explore the accounts receivable factoring plan as a more conservative option for your clients.

But be careful as you start looking at these plans. Many insurance agents are pitching accounts receivable leveraging to their wealthy clients, which is not the same as accounts receivable factoring. A typical accounts receivable leveraging strategy works as follows:

Assume Dr. Smith P.C. borrows money that equals the true amount of accounts receivable on the medical practice's books. That borrowed money is invested in a life insurance policy or annuities owned by Dr. Smith individually. The medical office is told to write off the interest on the loan, and the money funded in the life policy grows. When Dr. Smith reaches retirement age, the loan is paid back, and Dr. Smith keeps the life policy with all its cash value. He would then take tax-free loans from the policy as a supplemental retirement benefit.

This plan may seem attractive, but it has serious defects as presented. The accounts receivable leveraging plan has been around in one form or another for almost 20 years. It's a marginal asset protection tool because the medical practice does not actually sell the accounts receivable. What's more, it is an even less effective wealth accumulation tool.

There are four important problems with the accounts receivable leveraging plans currently in the marketplace:

* The interest on the loan to the medical practice may or may not be deductible. I've read legal opinions on both sides of the fence. If the interest is deemed not deductible, the plan becomes worse from a wealth accumulation standpoint than post-tax investing. And whether or not the interest is deductible, the interest payments still go to a bank, never to be seen again.

* The IRS can argue the client is charged with constructive receipt of the borrowed money in the year borrowed. If that is the case, Dr. Smith would have to pay incomes taxes in year one of the plan on all the borrowed money. That would defeat the plan purpose.

* Dr. Smith would have to recapture as income any cash value in the life policy once the cash surrender value gets above the amount of money that was poured into the life policy. For example, assume Dr. Smith P.C. borrowed $300,000 against office accounts receivable and that the entire amount was put into a life insurance policy. Early on, the surrender charges will keep the cash surrender value below $300,000. When the cash surrender value gets above $300,000, however, the physician must recapture that additional value as income each year.

So if the policy grows at 8% each year, Dr. Smith will recapture $24,000 in income the first year the policy grows above $300,000. That number will grow every year thereafter. Dr. Smith pays the tax every year, but he will not get to use the money until he takes tax- free loans from the policy several years down the road.

* The loan has to be repaid. Dr. Smith will have to find $300,000 post-tax dollars to pay back the original loan. Not surprisingly, sales reps pushing the plan usually ignore this topic. A medical practice with $300,000 on the books to pay back the loan won't have sufficient funds because taxes must first be paid on that $300,000.

Some of the problems with an accounts receivable leveraging plan can be salvaged by a few simple structural changes that are outside the scope of this article. Even so, be aware that the topic is not as clear-cut as the marketers of the plan make it out to be. To avoid the headaches of accounts receivable leveraging, it's better to study and understand a simple accounts receivable factoring plan like the one described in this article.

An Accounts Receivable Primer

Dr. Smith, age 45, factors $500,000 of his accounts receivable (A/ R) for 10 years at a 5% discount four times a year. This also reduces his current income tax, since he takes home $100,000 less per year. Assume a 7.9% pre-tax return in the stock market and 7.9% in the life policy used. Dr. Smith then retires after age 65 and lives 20 years.

Outcome Available funds at age 66-85

Post-tax investment account $95,294 a year after tax

with no A/R plan

A/R factoring life policy $243,871 income tax-free annually

loans via life policy

A/R factoring company $2.2 million return on its

investment

The A/R factoring plan as illustrated provides 155% more per year to Dr. Smith than post-tax investing of the $100,000 foregone each year. RD.

Roccy DeFrancesco, J.D., is one of the founders of www.triarcadvisors.com, a Web site and company devoted to the education of financial and legal professionals around the country. He is also the author of The Doctor's Wealth Preservation Guide. DeFrancesco can be reached at 269-469-0537 or roccy@wealthpreservation123.com.

Copyright 2003 Thomson Media Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Read More....

Factoring-When money flows

FACTORING; When Money Flows - Smoothing the business cycle makes sense; As memories of prompt payment fade into the past, organisations are tapping into factoring to safeguard cash flow.
Mark Story. New Zealand Management. Auckland: Mar 2005. pg. 57

Abstract (Summary)
While most large companies still issue invoices due on the 20th of the following month, many clients know they can get away without honouring payments within that cycle. This has spurred many companies to assume late payment is now the rule rather than the exception. While most large companies still issue invoices due on the 20th of the following month, many clients know they can get away without honouring payments within that cycle. This has spurred many companies to assume late payment is now the rule rather than the exception. At best, slow payment syndrome blocks business growth. At its worst it sounds the death knell for floundering enterprises. Factoring companies are willing to fall in behind the banks (concerning control of a company) as long as they have a security agreement giving them a first charge over the company's debt and sometimes any other assets. At face value most companies could benefit from factoring. But it's a niche product and therefore ideally suited for companies going through particular business cycles. In practice, most firms tend to utilise a factoring option facility for two to three years before reverting to more traditional funding or other non-bank alternatives such as stock and debtors' overdrafts.

In the five and a half years since he joined business financier S H Lock, Jason Williams has seen average invoice payment times drag out from 50 days to just under two months. It makes a mockery of 30-day payment terms.As the company's business development manager, Williams is only too aware of the discomfort many businesses feel when they demand clients pay outstanding invoices in one breath and tout for more business in the next.The dilemma is especially real for owner-operator businesses where the person making the sales and the invoice-chaser are one and the same. While most large companies still issue invoices due on the 20th of the following month, many clients know they can get away without honouring payments within that cycle. This has spurred many companies to assume late payment is now the rule rather than the exception, says Williams. Many business people hold back from chasing up overdue invoices for fear they may compromise the possibility of repeat business. Williams suspects this also explains why most firms are reluctant to invoke a late payment clause when invoices reach past due date.At best, slow payment syndrome blocks business growth. At its worst it sounds the death knell for floundering enterprises. Williams has seen first hand the effect on companies trying to sell goods and services to other businesses on normal trading terms. Many struggle to find sufficient cash to meet business running costs.The strain is especially evident among wholesalers and manufacturers who have to pay once goods are shipped."Lack of cash flow, rather than lack of sales, often prevents companies from developing beyond the initial stages," says Williams.He cites expansion efforts by a typical owner-operated giftware company as a prime example. The banks were reluctant to lend to the company without property security. When the owners eventually secured a bank loan to buy extra stock their growth was a small and part-time affair.The owners had failed to factor into their planning the disproportionate amount of time it would take for them to get paid. Recruitment companies face equally challenging hurdles. Those that fail to pay their temps on time find they simply go elsewhere. "So imagine the benefit of having clients paying 80 percent or more of what's owed 'on delivery'," says Williams. "Access to cash smooths the whole business cycle and allows companies to both grow and ride out the tough times." Most local companies know that factoring options exist. But, unlike overseas where factoring is handled by the banks, in New Zealand factoring needs are met by separate and specialist companies. A notable exception is the BNZ which offers a debtors' financing service of its own. Scottish Pacific Business Finance director David Cooper argues this specialisation creates the false impression that factoring must be lending of last resort.Cooper estimates between 300-500 Kiwi firms use factoring as short-term bridging finance on an ongoing basis. There's no doubt in his mind that non-bank financiers must continue to demonstrate to local businesses how factoring can foster company growth. The average loan has now burgeoned to around $100,000 - a fact that prompts Cooper to believe larger firms are now starting to use factoring as a growth tool. He also believes resistance to factoring is lessening, especially amongst the professional community. How does factoring work? Kiwi firms typically plump for the full-service option. Factoring companies are willing to fall in behind the banks (concerning control of a company) as long as they have a security agreement giving them a first charge over the company's debt and sometimes any other assets. Once this agreement is in place the company cuts an invoice and sends a copy to both its customer and the factoring company. On receipt of that invoice the factoring company immediately provides access to up to 80 percent, and sometimes more, of the value of the invoice. Having collected the outstanding invoice on the due date the factoring company will pay the client company the remaining 20 percent less charges (up to two percent of the total invoice) and interest at bank rates of around 11 percent annually (or a flat rate of around five percent). Based on Williams' calculations, the average cost incurred by companies using S H Lock's full service factoring option is three percent of turnover.Although less popular, some companies opt for a second stream of factoring called invoice discounting or undisclosed factoring. The factoring company still takes a charge over the debt and continues to pay out around 80 percent of the value of the invoice. But the discounting option is not disclosed to the client nor is there any debt collecting involved. Companies select factoring options based on their own financial strengths and weaknesses. Williams notes more mature companies with more robust balance sheets tend to favour invoice discounting, unless they specifically want a third party involved in collecting their invoices. "The companies that worry most about limited cash flow typically lack any understanding of how to get out of the predicament they're in."In Cooper's view, many companies fail to grasp that factoring is a more cost-effective option than simply offering a four percent or more discount for prompt payment. That's because discounts are seldom sufficient inducement to encourage prompt payment. "Even if a client accepts a five percent discount on a $100,000 invoice, the company still has to wait on average around 45 days to get paid," says Cooper. "Whereas with factoring the funds are virtually immediate while the cost is substantially less than $5000."It is possible to offset cash-flow uncertainty by having fewer yet larger clients that are historically good payers. But according to Williams selling into a major chain can be a Catch 22. "Large chain stores are more likely to pay on time but there's always the risk associated with having too many eggs in one basket. Especially if your company, almost by default, becomes an extension of the major chain's business and they unexpectedly have a new buyer who favours a new supplier."Who should consider factoring? At face value most companies could benefit. But, as Cooper says, it's a niche product and therefore ideally suited for companies going through particular business cycles. In practice, most firms tend to utilise a factoring option facility for two to three years before reverting to more traditional funding or other non-bank alternatives such as stock and debtors' overdrafts. "If a company's ledger grows from $50,000 to $200,000 the business can put $180,000 back out the door virtually immediately," says Cooper. "The banks would want further security."An inability to pay debts on time can affect a company's credit rating and may see it relegated to a 'cash only' basis. There are also penalties for directors seen to be trading within varying degrees of insolvency," he says.Cooper claims around 30 percent of his company's clients would have gone out of business fairly quickly or suffered a long and slow death had they not used factoring to free up cash flow. "The impact factoring has depends on how the cash that's freed up is used. Ideally it should be used to fund the fundamentals of the business," he says. "Don't fall into the trap of leaving factoring too late. It's not a cure-all for bad business.

"FEAR OF FACTORINGStill not sure whether factoring is the right option? Scottish Pacific Business Finance director David Cooper advises companies to ask themselves three key questions.1 If we had additional cash in the bank today, how much more product could we import?2 What profit can we make?3 Can we afford to pay a factoring company and still be ahead of the game?Mark Story is a regular contributor to Management.

Read More....
Custom Search